Talk:Body for Life
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Hi, I changed one sentence for the sake of NPOV. The principles may indeed be sound for a bodybuilding programme, but not all fitness enthusiasts believe that Western bodybuilding's theories are inherently sound compared to their own. This isn't a value judgment of the subject of the article, I'm not saying that bodybuilding is right or wrong, just acknowledging that not everyone agrees that the precepts of bodybuilding are the healthiest thing someone can do for fitness training. Regards, Fire Star 02:03, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Accepted. I put back your changes after I noticed your edit. (Oops.) It's hard when I'm editing a file and periodically updating the page. GeorgeStepanek 02:31, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Body for Life survived a VfD debate which began on November 18 2004. GeorgeStepanek 22:59, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 13:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)