Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Greer
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (CSD G4 -- reposted content). howcheng {chat} 18:13, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- NN Already been deleted once
- Anarchists, by nature, do not follow the rules, and this page having already been deleted once after full discussion has now been created again. Speedy Delete because such discourtesy does not deserve a second extended discussion. --StanZegel (talk) 17:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever - Not a completely NPOV decision, as I am the creator of the article and I know Evan personally. I am aware that the article has already been nominated for deletion. However, refer to my comment on the discussion page for this article. He's toured all over the United States and he passes the "google test" with 11,500 mentions. Daykart 19:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable enough. His webpage lists appearances in coffee shops and bakeries. That's not touring. If more notability can be established, will gladly change my vote. Flyboy Will 17:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't rate a hit in the allmusic.com database. Jgritz 11:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Evan Greer has performed at ABC No Rio, he has some clout in the anarchist folk scene. His collective Riot Folk is present on Wikipedia with no issue. (166.109.0.71)
- Delete I was the one who proposed this page for deletion for three reasons. 1) It has already been deleted once. 2) This incarnation of the article is even less informative and relevent than the previous and merits deletion on its own. 3) Not sure if this matters but I put this up for deletion after talking with Evan who vehemntly does not want a page on him. --FluteyFlakes88 08:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:08, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Advertising or self promotion; lacks biographical data; not of general renown.--StanZegel 04:59, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Restoring as deletion candidate after User:Brockert unilaterally removed it from consideration.--StanZegel 04:31, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, artist promo, possible vanity. Megan1967 07:14, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as capitalist self-promotion. Wyss 18:46, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The tone of it is just self-promotion. Zzyzx11 23:59, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, If I wanted to know about this artist, the information on this page would be of some help. It isn't blantant self-promotion.
- Delete, egotistical promotion vanity etc. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:37, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable self-promotion. Carrp | Talk 16:39, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like vanity to me. Robin Johnson 13:05, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.