Talk:DiPT

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about DiPT.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Altered States of Consciousness High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of altered states of consciousness on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

"DiPT is not explicitly scheduled, but possesion will most likely still be prosecuted under the Analog Act. As of July 2004, the illegality of DIPT was confirmed by Operation Web Tryp."

How could Operation Web Tryp confirm or disconfirm the illegality of any substance? Isn't it up to the courts to interpret the Analog Act?

Technicly, yes. Unfortunately, the popular opinion in America is so easily controlled by agencies such as the DEA that it really doesn't matter. I definitely understand your qualm here, and I would love to see a legal history of the legality of these supposed analogs, but I would personally not know how to frame that as the DEAs position is assumption of guilt in this instance in spite of court cases, apparently. So, technically DiPT may not be illegal, but those who sold it are being prosecuted i believe. Perhaps this should read something more like "As of July 2004, the illegality of DiPT has been seen to be evident enough by the DEA that Operation Web Tryp was carried out." Flying Hamster 15:14, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

We should decide between DIPT and DiPT (this article uses both) and use it consequently both in article titles and in the articles. I think DiPT is correct nomenclature. 80.203.115.12 09:46, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I am doing research on DIPT and a number of other psychedelics (http://life.ou.edu/pubs/Tucson04/). I would like to learn more about the tendency of DIPT to cause tinnitis. Flying_Hamster: please contact me at tray@ou.edu

Request

A section on the pharmacology of DiPT is deeply desired.

Spectralyst (talk) 14:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Title change

I have changed the article title from Diisopropyltryptamine to DiPT, mainly for the following Wikipedia article title guidelines:

1. Consistency: The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles. Many of these patterns are listed (and linked) as topic-specific naming conventions on article titles, in the box above. [Related compounds are named using this nomenclature. For example, DMT, 5-MeO-DMT, MiPT, 4-MeO-DiPT, etc.]

2. Concision: The title is no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects.

3. Recognizability: The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.

4. As above: Concision: The title is no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects.

5. Naturalness: The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English. Repylom (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]