Talk:Evolutionary biology
Appearance
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Evolutionary biology was copied or moved into Life sciences with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
A summary of this article appears in evolution. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Lead Section
[edit]The lead section is clear and concise, not overly detailed, but grasping the main points of the article in an easy to understand manner.Kacasti6 (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Further sections
[edit]Would adding a section about key papers (ie. Galapagos finch work done by the Grants) be beneficial? --AccidentalHerpetologist (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Citation change
[edit]Is there a better source for a definition of evolutionary biology, such as a peer reviewed paper or textbook? Biochem2 (talk) 01:54, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- C-Class Evolutionary biology articles
- Top-importance Evolutionary biology articles
- WikiProject Evolutionary biology articles
- C-Class Biology articles
- Top-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles