User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
Languages | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Search user languages |
Userbox | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Search user languages |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]User-reported
[edit]- 2601:98D:C201:A520:354F:2AFB:54F9:D23C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Continuous disruptive editing and inappropriate additions to articles, including creating unsourced drafts. No communication whatsoever, continues all the same. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 22:09, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Yongpeng_Sun (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Persistent use of unreliable sources (particularly WP:ARMYRECOGNITION) since at least mid-October (Special:Diff/1261764868, Special:Diff/1261113067, Special:Diff/1257307463, Special:Diff/1256293349, Special:Diff/1256292360, Special:Diff/1251828131, Special:Diff/1251827909, Special:Diff/1251826777, Special:Diff/1251066320, Special:Diff/1250911227, Special:Diff/1246652575). Continued through multiple warnings (Special:Diff/1251815381, Special:Diff/1256307723, Special:Diff/1257507199); no replies on either their talk page or on ANI. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 22:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- GuyFromEE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. User is not here to edit constructively, continues to make false claims of "multiple warnings" and is acting suspiciously (see sockpuppet investigation report for further supporting evidence). livelikemusic (TALK!) 22:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Skibiditoiletohiorizzl (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Follows the usual pattern of "skibidi" usernames trying to vandalize articles with "skibidi", etc. Devchar (talk) 13:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Memes aren't an automatic block. I've warned them for their edit filter hits. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- BigDick555 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – We now have three brand new accounts with only edits to this article making the same edits and restoring the changes after they have been reverted. Mellk (talk) 05:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. All three socks, and I have left a CTOPS notice on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page sees persistent WP:BE by an IP-hopping sock. I request a semi-protection to prevent these persistent reverts. Thank you! Chaipau (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Arb Assam (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 48 hours; this is not the only article they have been disrupting, either. I have also alerted him to CTOPS and will leave a notice to that effect on the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind; it already has a CTOPS notice. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case, I am renewing my request because IP-hopping editors are continuing with their reverts. Chaipau (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Never mind; it already has a CTOPS notice. Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Contentious topic RaschenTechner (talk) 20:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Katietalk 21:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- But LGBTQ topics are still contentious topics. RaschenTechner (talk) 21:41, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 104.218.129.10 (talk · contribs) blocked by zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 21:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Anon has been trying for many months to remove or negate a particular statement she does not like. It is usually quickly reverted, and Anon has been advised on the need to change the consensus first but ignores that advice. It was temporarily protected in July, but Anon is now back again. It should be permanently protected so only autoconfirmed editors can edit it. --Slugger O'Toole (talk) 21:03, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been five IP edits to the page since PC was added in July, and only two since the first of October. That's not nearly enough to justify permanent semi-protection. Pending changes seems to be working just fine. Katietalk 21:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unsourced date changes. Waxworker (talk) 21:12, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. I put down a pretty big range block that should fix problems on several articles you've had to revert on recently. If he returns in January, let me know and I'll re-block, as there's very little collateral on that range. Katietalk 21:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism. Waxworker (talk) 21:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Katietalk 21:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and the addition of movies that are clearly not a real thing from several IPs (since the last protection expired, there have been two different IPs adding stuff to this page). Requesting indefinite protection this time as it's clear last time didn't work and this has been an issue for months. λ NegativeMP1 21:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Removal of content. Persistent vandalism. Simione001 (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same vandalism as at WCIU-TV. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Crossroads -talk- 22:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IceWelder [✉] 22:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason:Article is in a poorly written state and barely gets meaningful contributions since it was last protected. No signs of disruptive editing for a long time either.Axedd (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Axedd: Is the long-term abuser that caused the article to be ECP'd still active on other articles? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- The case page is not a reliable indicator of if an LTA is active or not, especially if they're reveling in the attention. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Yamaguchi先生 --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The article was protected back in 2010, when protecting standards were far lower. I believe it's now ready to go unprotected, Cheers. 50.100.53.53 (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm willing to try unprotection after 14 years of indef protection, unless Courcelles objects. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Sergiogriffiths (talk) 23:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Sergiogriffiths. This is the section for requesting a reduction in protection level. Is that what you are asking for? Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:25, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done. The request is not clear. The OP appears to be asking for indefinite create protection but it is already create protected and has been since 2009. Perhaps they want the protection lifted in which case they can make another, more coherent request. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:55, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Not everything from the Middle East/Canaan/Israel/Palestine is related to the conflict. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 05:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Heyaaaaalol: For what it is worth, it was protected unilaterally for one year (the maximum allowed for unilateral actions), per an RfPP request that was initially only asking for a semi. This cannot be unprotected here, but if you want to contest it with it being three weeks away from the protection lapsing, take it to User talk:Daniel Quinlan or to WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.
The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,
Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.
I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥ 论 01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
- The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
1 protected edit request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 18:42, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
10 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:31, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
During the temporary stint granted as autopatrolled, I have created over 100 pages following the suggestions of the admin. Have been consistently adding relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them. Have also started using Rater and StubSorter. Trying to strengthen myself with Wikipedia's core content policies by regular reading. Requesting extension... Davidindia (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I have created 40 articles out of which 2 are deleted with a total edits of 2680, as of now. I also found myself listed in Wikipedia:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege. I promise, it'll be worth if I'm given the Autopatrolled privilege. Thanks, Hoping for a positive response. Taabii (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I want to get into the swing of helping out in more ways other than RCP/PCP. Manually editing each article can only do so much. This would be handy to have. Synorem (talk) 06:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Perform article maintenance on date formats, typos, etc. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 18:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request access to AutoWikiBrowser to assist with minor edits, formatting, and other repetitive tasks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Renamed from AWBunny, which is my alt and already on list. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 06:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed[edit]
Hi! Could I please have confirmed on this account? It'd be useful for testing the upload wizard without the various settings I have on my main account. Thanks, Mdaniels5757's sock (talk) 04:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
|
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I see that there is a large backlog, so I would like to help reduce it, especially the redirects, as I have more experience with them. I have not created any articles, but I have read the tutorials for NPR and related pages, so I will not make any unintentional (or intentional) detrimental edits. I am familiar with WP:BLAR, WP:PROD and WP:AfD, and have behaved civilly with other editors. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily (yes, mistakenly got a copyright report for an article) focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh. Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to become an NPR to help reduce the work, I regularly intervene on drafts and edit them to format them and put banners or comments to advise the creator on the steps to follow so that this draft becomes eligible, in the case that it is possible. I know the rules of Wikipedia and the essential points determining if an article is eligible or not. I see drafts being submitted but they are clearly not ready to be accepted and unfortunately I can't do anything at this time. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello I'm TyphoonAmpil. I'm meet all minimum requirements. I'm over 45+ AfC reviews and 5+ Accepted drafts. I'm adding tags {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} tags. I'm created 4 articles named Tropical Storm Maria (2024), Typhoon Ampil (2024), Typhoon Shanshan (2024), Typhoon Krathon. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
As a current pending changes reviewer, I would like to request the new page reviewer permission. I believe that I can review new pages, fact-check them, and help reduce creation vandalism. Z. Patterson (talk) 20:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Help out with the backlog. Well informed on content policies and guidelines. Fairly steady AfD participation history (looking past the big ugly chunk of "speedy keep" on my AfD history from a few hours ago, where I AfD'd a set of related articles but then decided to withdraw and WP:BLAR them instead.) ~~~~ RachelTensions (talk) 03:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Requesting NPR rights; Nearly 2700 total live edits. While I am familiar with AfC and article creation (three articles under my name, working on a fourth), I am admittedly not terribly familiar with AfD, PROD, or CSD. However, I am reading and re-reading these pages to familiarize myself. I believe I have a favorable history of interaction. I've been on Wikipedia for over a decade, and I have absorbed much, though I still have a significant amount to learn; that being said, I wish to become more active and more directly-involved. No behavioral blocks or 3RR violations. I commit to 'patrol' on a voluntary basis and to avoid conflicts of interest. Thank you for your time and consideration! MWFwiki (talk) 03:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
I believe I meet all of the NPP criteria. I have experience at AFD, having a lifetime match rate of around 80%, and have been a reviewer at AFC as well. I don't believe I have any other significant issues. I wish to gain this right in order to help with the backlog of new pages needing review, both in order to help the community and to gain more experience. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am requesting again for New Page Reviewer, although quite fast but I am a fast lerner. I just wanna have a trial here since I am helping sometimes in NewPagesFeed like maintenance tags like {{unreferenced}}, {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} or rarely i clean up the articles too, it just a minor helps. I am a AfC reviewer too since October 2024. I can multitasking on New Page and reviewing draft articles in afc. Although, I have a blocked here but it was a misunderstanding and false blocking so they unblock my account. I am participating on AfD and sometimes i nominate it, also on CSD too in NewPageFeed, if I see a just a spam, vandalism or a promotion of a article, i immediately add a csd. If you granted me, it will my pleasure. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 16:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedian, I am requesting for New Page Reviewer rights to enhance my contributions to Wikipedia. With major experience in article creation, editing, and compliance to Wikipedia’s guidelines, I am passionate to help ensure new pages meet quality standards. I am committed to improving the Wikipedia community and would greatly appreciate your consideration. Thank you for your time! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for page mover |
---|
Page mover[edit]
I have been participating and closing RMs for a while. I would like this perm to fulfill more requests at RM/TR. For now I have one draftify, but would like to eventually dab into more. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I've read and understood WP:RPC and will proceed slowly at first (that is, leave what I deem edge cases to someone else). JayCubby Talk 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback[edit]
My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Dealing with a lot of vandalism lately. Undoing, warning and reporting. Hope that undoing could be made easier with Rollback rights. YBSOne (talk) 20:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi, requesting rollback permission for my counter-vandalism efforts, as I would like to quickly remove obvious vandalism and to access helpful tools. I have been active in this area for several months here and even longer on dewiki. Therefore, I am familiar with the relevant guidelines and tools. With regards, –MrBenjo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC) MrBenjo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Would be used for reverting edits by blocked socks of banned users, similar to this request nableezy - 20:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I am here to reapply for rollback permissions to assist in combating vandalism more efficiently. Over time, I have actively reverted vandalism using the "undo" tool and have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies, particularly vandalism and rollback.I fully understand that rollback should only be used for clear cases of vandalism, and I am committed to using the tool responsibly. My contributions reflect my dedication to maintaining Wikipedia's quality and integrity.If there are any concerns or further clarification needed regarding my request, please let me know. Thank you for considering my request.MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 11:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to give Huggle and AntiVandal a try. Polygnotus (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozu • teacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting access in order to enhance my ability to help protect Wikipedia from vandalism. This permission will grant me access to additional tools that will assist in maintaining the integrity of the platform. Hemlock :3 leave a message 03:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
|
Immediate requests
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Wikipedians looking for help | 1 |
Requests for unblock | 110 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
Candidates for speedy deletion | 11 |
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Articles for deletion | 578 |
Templates for deletion | 98 |
Categories for deletion | 80 |
Wikipedia files for discussion | 59 |
All redirects for discussion | 320 |
Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 17 |
Possible copyright violations | 10 |
All articles proposed for deletion | 249 |
All files proposed for deletion | 105 |
Unsorted AfD debates | 0 |
All files with the same name on Commons | 2 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Orphaned non-free use | 417 |
Unknown copyright status | 47 |
Unknown source | 83 |
No non-free use rationale | 6 |
Replaceable non-free use images | 15 |
Disputed non-free use images | 45 |
Page protection
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Protected | 10 |
Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,241 |
Fully protected user and user talk pages | 442 |
Protected against vandalism | 4 |
Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
Semi-protected | 2,314 |
Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]
General cleanup | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
---|---|---|
All pages needing cleanup | 33,988 | 0.49 |
All articles needing rewrite | 6,008 | 0.09 |
All articles needing expert attention | 1,337 | 0.02 |
All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 39,978 | 0.58 |
Reference problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All pages needing factual verification | 11,130 | 0.16 |
All articles with unsourced statements | 535,061 | 7.73 |
All articles lacking sources | 71,712 | 1.04 |
All unreferenced BLPs | 6 | 0 |
All articles needing additional references | 474,562 | 6.86 |
All articles needing references cleanup | 4,614 | 0.07 |
All articles lacking in-text citations | 105,488 | 1.52 |
All articles with dead external links | 313,854 | 4.53 |
Image cleanup problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
Wikipedia files lacking a description | 139 | - |
Wikipedia files with unknown source | 18 | - |
Other problems | ||
Category | Entries | Percentage |
All articles to be merged | 1,088 | 0.02 |
All articles to be split | 809 | 0.01 |
Unsorted Stubs | 0 | - |
Stub categories | 19,265 | - |
All uncategorized pages | 681 | 0.01 |
All orphaned articles | 53,002 | 0.77 |
All articles needing copy edit | 0 | 0 |
All articles with style issues | 19,580 | 0.28 |
All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,757 | 0.04 |
All articles that may contain original research | 16,498 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]Category | Entries |
---|---|
Requested moves | 360 |
All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 7,349 |
All accuracy disputes | 15,765 |
Articles with invalid ISBNs | 0 |
Articles with invalid ISSNs | 4 |
All articles to be expanded | 65,976 |
Special pages
[edit]Maintenance reports | Information |
---|---|
Broken redirects | |
Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
Long pages | |
New pages | New page patrol |
New pages feed | Page curation |
Protected pages | Protection policy |
Short pages | |
Uncategorized | Categorization |
Uncategorized cats | |
Uncategorized templates | |
Unused categories | |
Unused files (images) | |
Unused templates | |
Without interwiki links | |
Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]Misc
[edit]Delete | Keep | Neutral | Oppose | Support | Note | Template |
This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. |