Talk:Saxophone

Saxophone is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 11, 2004.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 19, 2004	Refreshing brilliant prose	Kept
January 7, 2007	Featured article review	Demoted
January 8, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 3, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
January 25, 2011	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 17, 2004, May 17, 2005, June 28, 2011, June 28, 2013, and June 28, 2016.
Current status: Former featured article

Musical Instruments Top‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jazz Top‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links

Saxophone's list of external links is being reviewed as part of WikiProject External links — a quality control effort aimed at keeping the number of links to a reasonable length, and in compliance with Wikipedia External links guidelines. Wikipedia is NOT a link repository.External linksWikipedia:WikiProject External linksTemplate:WikiProject External linksExternal links articles

WikiProject External links tasks you can do:

WikiProject External links	This box: (watch • edit • changes • add / remove a task)
Open Tasks: Fix the broken links in the Featured Articles using the Checklinks tool Intelligent vehicle technologies (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) - Looking for a third opinion on some of the links in the article that appear to be commercial firms. Trying to avoid an edit war. Information Technology Infrastructure Library (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) There has been a long debate on external links to be included, third opinions invited in particular for the forum websites referenced that may be useful but are not discussed in the main article. Extreme pornography (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) This is about the term being used by the UK's Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 but is obviously a controversial topic with a number of arguably useful pornographic example links added 2009 swine flu pandemic (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) As a hot news topic this article can suffer from excessive links from dubious un-official sources Model_View_ViewModel (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) The Open source MVVM frameworks section contains links to several products that would fail notability as having no coverage in independent sources, e.g. Mugen MVVM Toolkit. Is this linkspam? - Pointillist (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belgium Low‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

"Groups"/"Categories"/"Series"/"Families" of seven instruments - inconsistent terminology

In the article, especially the lede and first section, the "groups" of seven instruments (C/F and B flat/E flat) are called variously "groups", "categories", "series" and "families". I should like to use consistent wording throughout, but I don't know which is bet to use (I should favour "series"). Does anyone have any opinions? Si Trew (talk)

"Military" and "Orchestral" series

Given the uncertainty as to whether the "military" and "orchestral" terms were ever applied to the two original series of saxophones, and the superfluous nature of such a debate to understanding the bare facts pertaining to those series, to wit, the B♭ and E♭ series under which most instruments were produced and a small minority of instruments in the C and F series, any reference to those terms in that context seems unnecessary. My only familiarity with "military pitch" is with reference to the High Pitch instruments made for marching bands and "military series" may reflect a conflation of those instruments with the early ones produced in the keys of the modern saxophone family.

Please add a fingering chart!

I would love to see a fingering chart in the article even if this isn't a "how-to" it would still greatly benefits users who would like to learn more on the saxophone and how to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanasia4 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Strich" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Strich has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 26 § Strich until a consensus is reached. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 12:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Table of Saxophones

I was going to add the C Melody saxophones, Mezzo-Soprano and Conn-o-sax to the table of saxophones along with their SPN ranges, but the page is semi-protected and I haven't edited 4+ articles. I see you decided not to include/removed the C Melodies, or maybe that was another editor/author, but has this page really seen so much vandalism that semi-protection is necessary until 2028?

Have a care, P. James Norris Pjamesnorris (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Related instruments" section

The section called "Related instruments" is missing some very important information: why are they even being mentioned? It is already pointed out, quite correctly, that most of these instruments are technically unrelated to saxophones, and are in fact much more like some other instrument. OK – then what's the point of writing about them? Is it because, even though they are nothing like a saxophone, we have proof that they were inspired by the saxophone, and not inspired by the clarinet or other instruments? That's great – let's show the proof. TooManyFingers (talk) 00:14, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]