Talk:Metre per second squared

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

8th Grade Opinion

We're learning about m/s/s in the eighth grade here, and here would be America. We don't use the metric system [though we should here] but in my physical science book it is noted as "meter per second per second" or "meter per second squared". Sean (talk || contribs| esperanza)) 16:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Phrasing of article

A measurement of acceleration can be a scalar or a vector, but not both. Therefore, it's better to use "or" in the relevant sentence.
Newton's second law is the statement F=ma. The statement 1 N = 1 kg · m s^-2 is a special case, or example, of Newton's second law.
Quotation marks are for quoting, not emphasis.

Spacepotato 06:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete second paragraph

I propose to delete the second paragraph of the current version. It rambles onto other matters and will just be a source of confusion to the reader. The first paragraph says all that needs to be said. Any comments? Xxanthippe 22:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Bogus article

Acceleration is not a base or named derived unit in the International system of units. Many kind of quantities (in fact, almost any you can think of) can be expressed in the SI units - that's what they were designed for. Only a handful of those quantities have their own named units in SI. Thearticle is false inthat sense, and misleading. I've therefore nominated it for deletion. Sbalfour (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nonexistent citation

The first citation is nonexistent

M/s-2

Difinitin 119.152.59.49 (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]