User talk:Cheeni
Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
Thanks for the warm welcome, user:maveric149. Glad to contribute! --Cheeni 16:30, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Indian philately
[edit]Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! I see you have some interest in stamps; you may want to take a look at postage stamps and postal history of India, fill out my feeble effort from over a year ago - needs more pics to illustrate the eras, plus all the different states. Stan 17:09, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Hi Stan,
- Glad you pointed that page out, it's got a lot of interesting stuff. I love the nice scans of the stamps you have there, photographing stamps isn't half as good.
- I know you've said that recent Indian stamps are of low quality and collectors don't usually care for them - but, fwiw I have a small collection (a few hundred stamps) of new mostly unmarked Indian stamps & first day covers released between 1983 and the early 90s. I find many of them remarkably colorful, unusually huge and some of them are double stamps (art extending onto more than one stamp), triangular stamps or otherwise uniquely shaped. Naturally, none of them saw much use on regular mail. If you'd like pics of any of them for the history page, I could possibly shoot them on a high quality digicam as best as I can (I don't own a scanner). I really don't know a whole lot about philately; I lost interest as an early teen. --Cheeni 20:07, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Looking at the article again, I think the "quality" knock is too sweeping - the era of muddy lithographs is really just 1950s-60s. I'll fix the article unless you want to. Don't worry about digicam photos, too hard to get details in. As you can see from clicking on images in User:Stan Shebs/Gallery/Philately, high resolution gives the reader a "virtual magnifying glass" - very useful when someone is halfway around the world and wants to examine a stamp closely without having one in hand! Stan 21:13, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board
[edit]Hi. I would like you to be an active member of Wikipedia:Indian wikipedians' notice board. utcursch 07:45, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
Image:Shoukadou bentou.jpg
[edit]Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Shoukadou bentou.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell (talk) (help) 14:09, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
Image:Cmu fence.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]dbenbenn | talk 23:50, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
I have to second this request - you took these pictures, posted them on wikipedia and intended them to be used in the Carnegie Mellon article, and now they want to remove them. Could you change the licensing so they can stay? --Matt 16:40, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Toi 150 common man.jpg
[edit]License tagging for Image:MNIC prototype.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:MNIC prototype.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure borough is the best choice, please see my note at Talk:Tehsil. I admit I am not very well informed. Let's continue the discussion at the tehsil talk page if you like. —EsdnePyaJ 01:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
The above image is currently an orphan as it is not used in any articles. Please review and if interested in it not being deleted, please place it into use. If you have any qustions, please feel free to drop me a note on my talk page.--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Bootvis-screenshot.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Bootvis-screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
need to add cons of having a naitonal id card
[edit]the onbly con is privacy implication.no other serious consequences are given. this mnic is totally unconstitutional btw and is agisnt the fundamental right to privacy even in US 20 states have opposed it http://www.no2id.net/IDSchemes/whyNot.php —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manchurian candidate (talk • contribs) 16:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of OpenACS
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article OpenACS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- no calm of notability seems to be using wp for free advertisement for product.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 16x9 (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Image problems
[edit]Hi, I nominated File:RKNarayan.jpg, File:Nikolass Tinbergen.gif, File:Nilgiris.jpg, File:MNIC prototype.jpg for deletion, please check the pages. Regards Hekerui (talk) 07:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
File:RKNarayan.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:RKNarayan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 06:49, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Nilgiris.jpg listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nilgiris.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 06:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
The article AOLserver has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not meet the general notability guideline
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mootros (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
European Union Directive on Data Protection of 1995
[edit]I am trying to understand what relationship exists, if any, between the various restructurings in the U.S. and Great Britain, which resulted in the merger of two Consumer Data Collection Companies, Experian in the US and Great Universal Stores in Britain, and the sequelia in Europe and the U.S. resulting from the EU directive on Data Protection in 1995.
The most observable financial result was that Bain Capital made a 300% profit on a $100 million investment in what amounted to a 2-3 month period of investment. The operational result was the merger of two gigantic consumer data base companies, whose combined data was presumably then subject to the lesser of the restrictions from Great Britain and/or the U.S.
Serendipity is a wonderful thing, but this boggles the mind.
Gary PelphreyGaryBats (talk) 02:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:Coonoor tea plantation.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:12, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of OpenACS
[edit]The article OpenACS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- not notable, multiple issues since 2009 + another since 2012
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Be..anyone (talk) 03:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of OpenACS for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenACS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.–Be..anyone (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Cheeni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Cheeni. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MNIC-tender.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:MNIC-tender.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 15:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Cheeni. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)