User talk:Isdu
Here are some links I thought useful:
- Wikipedia:Tutorial
- Wikipedia:Help desk
- M:Foundation issues
- Wikipedia:Policy Library
- Wikipedia:Utilities
- Wikipedia:Cite your sources
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Wikiquette
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Conflict resolution
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
- Wikipedia:Peer review
- Wikipedia:Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense
- Wikipedia:Brilliant prose
- Wikipedia:List of images
- Wikipedia:Boilerplate text
- Wikipedia:Current polls
- Wikipedia:Mailing lists
- Wikipedia:IRC channel
Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. The Wikipedia:Village pump is also a good place to go for quick answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
Sam [Spade] 13:39, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
sorry
[edit][1] dab 13:47, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC) Could you please explain? "The theosophs claimed the Aryans to be God's chosen race to free the world." This is simply wrong. No Theosophist ever claimed that. For the Theosphists Aryans are the fifth root race, out of seven root races. --Isdu 13:57, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry. I misread your edit and I apologize. I'm reverting my reversion. thank you for inreasing the article's accuracy! dab 14:01, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Hi Isdu,
I dont know whether the astronomic data mentioned in the Rigveda or for that matter any non-scientific literature could be taken as firm evidence. Not that they might not be accurate, but that they were not intended to be a scientific record at the first place. Which again I shoul say is not to doubt its accuracy. Literary sources could be used as information to corroborate ideas not as starting point themselves. when it comes to historical anthropology as a starting point one would have to fall back on linguistic cognates and syntactic structures. Given that note you might rephrase and add the two sentences. Water Fish 10:38, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)