Talk:Rising (Stargate Atlantis)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Antarctica Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage / Stargate

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Stargate task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Split then re-merge

I originally split this article into 2, but the good discussion on Talk:List of Star Trek TNG episodes convinced me to do otherwise. - UtherSRG 22:25, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

plot correct for the two parts?

I recently watched rising (stargate atlantis is finally on a station I get) and I assume it was part one as the just went to atlantis. It ends just after the Wraith go through the gate and people are running away. Unless part 1 is over an hour long and was split into two parts.

Rising is a two-part episode. You have indeed been cut off halfway through. It's usually broadcasted all at once so that's strange.-- Alfakim -- talk 11:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about the DVD: i dont have cable : so i watch on free tv and buy the seasons on dvd. ON the dvd atlantis rising its just one long episode, kinda like a mini movie

The Mastadge

Within the banquet scene with the Wraith Queen and Colonel Sumner, a Mastadge head is seen on the table, apparently as a way of keeping that animal in all three Stargate "pilots" (The original movie, SG-1, and Atlantis). It's declared as such on the DVD commentary for the episode, which is source enough for me and was stated in the Trivia section of the article, but there's a slight problem; it wasn't in the SG-1 pilot (Children of the Gods). I just bought the DVD's for the entire Stargate series a few days ago and, having rewatched Children of the Gods, did not see a Mastadge (Although I did see many scenes which are never in the TV broadcast, and they were a hoot). Now, DVD commentary is a source, but so is a broadcast episode itself, and I don't think we should have a note saying it was in all three pilots when it, in fact, wasn't. I edited out the statement that it was in Children of the Gods, but now it's not actully what was said in the source...so I'm stumped. Do we edit it to just say it was in the movie and Rising, which is accurate but unsourced, or leave it at saying it was in all three, which is source but inaccurate? JBK405 22:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Of course, if it was in Children of the Gods and I just missed it, the nevermind and somebody just throw it back into the article.

Fair use rationale for Image:Rising part 1 (Stargate Atlantis).jpg

Image:Rising part 1 (Stargate Atlantis).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot tagged

It's long and not written very well. I just tagged it for now, but I'll attempt a rewrite if I have the time.Kingdomcarts (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote part 1, but I didn't add links. I'd like to finish part 2 before I get to that, but if anyone would like (or if anyone's paying attention), please feel free.Kingdomcarts (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

K...threw in some links. I left out the Pegasus Galaxy link because the show is unclear as to which Pegasus Galaxy in the Local Group it is. I'll finish part 2 in the next couple of days.Kingdomcarts (talk) 20:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Rising (Stargate Atlantis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]