Talk:Wladislav III
To MT There is still that bunch of names and no one has definitely decided what names to use. I needed to make some connection to continue the history on Prussia. Has any one decided, or who would decide what naes to use ? Suggestion, we could put Ladislas III under Hungary, where it belongs and Wladislav III under Polish kings . HJ (Posted January 11, 2002 by User:Conversion script)
- We don't need multiple listings for one person - that's what redirects are for. I personally don't care what the name at the top of the page is (since it's after 1150), but it's a mess. --MichaelTinkler (Posted January 11, 2002 by User:MichaelTinkler)
To MT and Larry , The way Larry suggested Ladislaus III makes sence to me. I think we should leave it like this (at least for now ):Ladislaus under Hungary and Wladislav under Poland. The whole subject is confusing enough as it is, but this way it is easier to comprehend. HJ (Posted January 11, 2002 by User:H.J.)
Start a discussion about improving the Wladislav III page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wladislav III" page.
