Wikipedia:Peer review/Canadian Pacific Railway/archive1
Appearance
I've done a fair bit of work on this article and am thinking about nominating it as a fac. Before I do so, I'd like to get some comments on it, so I'd welcome any feedback. I'm particularly interested in getting feedback on whether it's comprehensive enough and/or whether there's anything that can be deleted. I had originally thought of adding much more stuff to the article but it's already over 32k so I decided not to. Thanks in advance, JYolkowski 00:09, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Here's my two cents: (1) more pictures; (2) add more data on the financials of the company, UNLESS you make it clear that this article is about the company itself, and not te operator, in which case you probably need to spin off an article about "Canadian Pacific Railway Limited" itself. (This is similar to the MTR and MTR Corporation split). I took a quick glance on the official homepage of CP Rail and saw lots of financial information about its IPO, etc., which could be useful. --JuntungWu 15:37, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't have a lot of pictures in my personal collection, but I've added some that were already here, and I'll see if I can find some other free images to use. I'm going to start working on splitting up the article and spinning an article off about the company.. -JYolkowski 00:28, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- You can take out the stuff on the presidents of the company and shove that to the spin-off about "Canadian Pacific Railway Limited". JuntungWu 13:01, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I've created Canadian Pacific Railway Limited and moved a bit of stuff, including the list of presidents. I may tweak it more, but at any rate Canadian Pacific Railway is looking better now. Thanks again, JYolkowski 02:48, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- You can take out the stuff on the presidents of the company and shove that to the spin-off about "Canadian Pacific Railway Limited". JuntungWu 13:01, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't have a lot of pictures in my personal collection, but I've added some that were already here, and I'll see if I can find some other free images to use. I'm going to start working on splitting up the article and spinning an article off about the company.. -JYolkowski 00:28, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Does anyone else have any other comments? TIA, JYolkowski 01:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, I think this is very good! Perhaps it might be time to submit it to FAC? - Ta bu shi da yu 02:57, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've done that now. JYolkowski 23:31, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Actually, I think this is very good! Perhaps it might be time to submit it to FAC? - Ta bu shi da yu 02:57, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)