Talk:Fallacy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Livicottle.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Seabrams305.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mis-spelling

The book title of reference 1 is misspelled. I don not know how to edit it. Can someone please correct it? 218.161.70.252 (talk) 05:49, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for mentioning it. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 06:46, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism in certain sections of the article

The article appears to have several paragraphs either closely related to, or directly lifted from, this book: Kisak, Paul F. (2015). The Logical Fallacy: The Art of the Argument & Critical Thinking. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ISBN 9781517533465. Could it be possible to verify whether it is plagiarism? MaleficentChimera (talk) 17:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Faulty thinking" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Faulty thinking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 29 § Faulty thinking until a consensus is reached. Hildeoc (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Duplicate?

I'm looking at this page for Fallacy, and am looking at the page for Formal fallacy, and have no idea what the difference is. Aren't they referring to the same thing so should be merged? If there's a difference, what is it? BritishWikipedian (talk) 16:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Third paragraph of the lead: Fallacies are commonly divided into "formal" and "informal." A formal fallacy is a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument that renders the argument invalid, while an informal fallacy originates in an error in reasoning other than an improper logical form. Arguments containing informal fallacies may be formally valid, but still fallacious. Paradoctor (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]