Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Historical archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

~~Who is the moron who have seen to that every article listing has both a Keep and a Remove vote? We'll come nowhere.~~ -- Sverdrup (talk) 12:22, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)
- I am sorry. Obviously I am wrong. I just misinterpreted the voting style and confused it with that of requests for adminship and other conventionalia. –- Sverdrup (talk) 14:28, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

That doesn't seem to be true. I think that the Refreshing brilliant prose pages are more important than VfD. Agrees? r3m0t 12:39, 13 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Let's see, I count 38 articles on which the votes are unanimous so far. I honestly don't know what you are blathering about. -- Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 12:50, Dec 13, 2003 (UTC)