User talk:Jvraba

Hello Jvraba and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry article cleanup

Hi,

I'm willing to do any necessary clean up with your article on gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. However, could you provide me with your references so it will be much easier to figure out how to clean up the article? Allentchang 08:23, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I'll try to get the cleanup done before Christmas. Allentchang 22:00, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Sign your vote

If you want someone to count your vote at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Roman Catholics you should sign your comment (just add ~~~~ ) NoSeptember 11:52, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you are an Attorney, I suggest you do your research prior to making statements. There is no U.S. jurisdiction that I can find that prohibits attorneys holding the J.D. from using the title doctor under the current ethics rules. In fact, the ABA and all states that have examined the issue under the current ethics rules have stated that it is permissible. It is true that under the former cannons of ethics, the use of the title doctor was prohibited as self-laudation. However, if any jurisdiction still has such an ethics rule, it would be found to be unconstitutional as were ethics rules prohibiting attorney advertising.75.13.146.44 14:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Digital vehicle lighting

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Digital vehicle lighting, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Portrait of Robert Septimus Gardiner.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Portrait of Robert Septimus Gardiner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ernest Addison Moody portrait.jpg

The file File:Ernest Addison Moody portrait.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks source information. I'm unable to verify that this is actually a legitimate photo of the subject, and the uploader is long gone.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]